<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top Ten TV Couples</title>
	<atom:link href="http://marthamihalick.com/2009/11/21/top-ten-tv-couples/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://marthamihalick.com/2009/11/21/top-ten-tv-couples/</link>
	<description>curiosities from a children&#039;s book editor</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 12:42:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cheryl</title>
		<link>http://marthamihalick.com/2009/11/21/top-ten-tv-couples/#comment-149</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cheryl]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 06:16:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marthamihalick.com/?p=362#comment-149</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a &quot;West Wing&quot; fan, you will like this essay:  http://www.jennycrusie.com/for-writers/essays/the-five-things-ive-learned-about-writing-romance-from-tv/   

(Jennifer Crusie&#039;s books are fantastic too -- my very favorite adult-reading comfort food.)

But off the examples cited in the essay:  I think all lists of great TV couples should include Buffy and either Spike or Angel. And Luke and Lorelei should be listed alongside Rory and Jess.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a &#8220;West Wing&#8221; fan, you will like this essay:  <a href="http://www.jennycrusie.com/for-writers/essays/the-five-things-ive-learned-about-writing-romance-from-tv/" rel="nofollow">http://www.jennycrusie.com/for-writers/essays/the-five-things-ive-learned-about-writing-romance-from-tv/</a>   </p>
<p>(Jennifer Crusie&#8217;s books are fantastic too &#8212; my very favorite adult-reading comfort food.)</p>
<p>But off the examples cited in the essay:  I think all lists of great TV couples should include Buffy and either Spike or Angel. And Luke and Lorelei should be listed alongside Rory and Jess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cindy</title>
		<link>http://marthamihalick.com/2009/11/21/top-ten-tv-couples/#comment-146</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cindy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 04:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marthamihalick.com/?p=362#comment-146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[love the fancy new digs, martha!

didnt you love how jesse became published?
i&#039;m fairly certain he said it was a small press?
i don&#039;t think he did vanity? =D

i would have included mulder and scully
and can&#039;t remember their names in moonlighting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>love the fancy new digs, martha!</p>
<p>didnt you love how jesse became published?<br />
i&#8217;m fairly certain he said it was a small press?<br />
i don&#8217;t think he did vanity? =D</p>
<p>i would have included mulder and scully<br />
and can&#8217;t remember their names in moonlighting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angie</title>
		<link>http://marthamihalick.com/2009/11/21/top-ten-tv-couples/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Angie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 21:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://marthamihalick.com/?p=362#comment-145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ooh. Nice job with the West Wing hat trick! All three are superb. And Scarecrow and Mrs. King! I love Lee and Amanda. Watched it w/my mom, too. *happy*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ooh. Nice job with the West Wing hat trick! All three are superb. And Scarecrow and Mrs. King! I love Lee and Amanda. Watched it w/my mom, too. *happy*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

